Files
LithosAnanake/FABRIC-3.md
T
Robert Allan JamesandClaude Sonnet 5 72c14cb9eb
Build / build-amd64-iso (push) Waiting to run
Build / build-aarch64-iso (push) Waiting to run
Build / build-riscv64-img (push) Waiting to run
FABRIC-3.md: open new living document (bare metal boot); close FABRIC-2.md
FABRIC-2.md closed/archival as of 2026-09-04 -- its full punch list
(§I) was worked through to completion this session. FABRIC-3.md opens
as the new living document, topic: bare metal boot (FABRIC-2.md §I.6's
own Milestone 8, the one item that couldn't close from a coding
session -- needs a real machine and a human present).

First task written up before executing, per this series' own standing
discipline: merge v2.0.1 into master and verify build/function
equivalence on a clean master tree. Investigated the branch topology
first -- master is a strict ancestor of v2.0.1 (47 commits behind, no
divergent history), so this is a pure fast-forward, not a real merge.

Updated FABRIC-4.md's and .claude/CLAUDE.md's stale pointers at
FABRIC-2.md as "current/living" to point at FABRIC-3.md instead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019YcT3H2PQeyujrzjqS3Var
2026-09-04 11:31:04 -04:00

3.8 KiB

FABRIC-3.md — bare metal boot

Status: Living working document, opened 2026-09-04 as the successor to FABRIC-2.md (now closed/archival — see its own header). Topic for this document, per direct instruction: bare metal boot — getting LithosAnanke to actually boot on real hardware, not just QEMU. FABRIC-2.md §I.6 (Milestone 8) already named this as the one item that pass couldn't close from a coding session at all, for exactly this reason — it needs a real machine and a human physically present. This document is where that work, and everything downstream of it, gets tracked.

How to use this document going forward. New findings, new punch-list items, and new decisions for bare-metal-boot work get added here, not to FABRIC-2.md. Same discipline every prior document in this series used: write the decision and its reasoning down before building, close items with a dated note citing real evidence, never silently drop a stale claim.


I.1 — Task 1: merge v2.0.1 into master, verify build/function equivalence

Written up before executing, per direct instruction and this series' own standing discipline.

Why this is task 1. FABRIC-2.md's entire 7-step closure pass (§I.1–§I.5, §I.7, plus today's FABRIC-series rename) happened on the v2.0.1 branch, not master. Before any real bare-metal-boot work starts, that work needs to land where .claude/CLAUDE.md says the project's sole production line actually lives: master. Doing this first, cleanly, before starting new work avoids ever having two divergent lines to reconcile later.

Investigated before writing this up, not assumed:

  • git merge-base --is-ancestor master v2.0.1true. master (local HEAD d2a0305) is a strict ancestor of v2.0.1 (HEAD b031b80) — v2.0.1 is exactly master plus 47 commits forward, no divergent history on either side. This means the "merge" is a pure fast-forward, not a real three-way merge — nothing to resolve, no conflict possible.
  • origin/master carries exactly one commit beyond local master (58c59e8, "Initial commit") that local master hadn't fetched yet — confirmed already contained in v2.0.1's own history (git merge-base --is-ancestor 58c59e8 v2.0.1 — true), so it introduces no discrepancy either.
  • master's own tree still has the old FABRIC.md/FABRIC-2.md/FABRIC-3.md naming (unrenamed) — expected, since today's rename commit (b031b80) only exists on v2.0.1 so far. The fast-forward brings the rename to master along with everything else; nothing separate needs doing for it.

Plan:

  1. Fast-forward master to v2.0.1's tip (git checkout master && git merge --ff-only v2.0.1) — refuses loudly instead of silently doing a real merge if the ancestor relationship somehow isn't what the investigation above found, so this step re-verifies its own precondition.
  2. Push master to origin.
  3. Verify build/function equivalence on a genuinely clean tree, not by inference: git clean (after confirming nothing untracked-but-wanted is present), then the full acceptance sequence .claude/CLAUDE.md already mandates for any kernel change — clean qemu on all three architectures, in the foreground, one at a time, each reaching ok> and shutting down cleanly. Since the tree is byte-identical to v2.0.1's post-fast-forward, this is expected to reproduce exactly what v2.0.1's own last acceptance pass already showed — the point of re-running it here is to confirm that expectation holds on master itself, not to assume it from the fast-forward alone.
  4. Return to v2.0.1 as the working branch afterward (.claude/CLAUDE.md's own rule: always return to the correct working branch after any out-of-branch work), unless told otherwise.

Not yet done — this section will be updated with results once execution completes.