LithosAnanake/FABRIC-3.md

# FABRIC-3.md — bare metal boot

**Status:** Living working document, opened 2026-09-04 as the successor to `FABRIC-2.md`
(now closed/archival — see its own header). Topic for this document, per direct instruction:
**bare metal boot** — getting LithosAnanke to actually boot on real hardware, not just QEMU.
`FABRIC-2.md` §I.6 (Milestone 8) already named this as the one item that pass couldn't close
from a coding session at all, for exactly this reason — it needs a real machine and a human
physically present. This document is where that work, and everything downstream of it, gets
tracked.

**How to use this document going forward.** New findings, new punch-list items, and new
decisions for bare-metal-boot work get added here, not to `FABRIC-2.md`. Same discipline every
prior document in this series used: write the decision and its reasoning down before building,
close items with a dated note citing real evidence, never silently drop a stale claim.

---

## I.1 — Task 1: merge `v2.0.1` into `master`, verify build/function equivalence

**Written up before executing**, per direct instruction and this series' own standing
discipline.

**Why this is task 1.** `FABRIC-2.md`'s entire 7-step closure pass (§I.1–§I.5, §I.7, plus
today's FABRIC-series rename) happened on the `v2.0.1` branch, not `master`. Before any real
bare-metal-boot work starts, that work needs to land where `.claude/CLAUDE.md` says the
project's sole production line actually lives: `master`. Doing this first, cleanly, before
starting new work avoids ever having two divergent lines to reconcile later.

**Investigated before writing this up, not assumed:**
- `git merge-base --is-ancestor master v2.0.1` — **true**. `master` (local HEAD `d2a0305`) is
  a strict ancestor of `v2.0.1` (HEAD `b031b80`) — `v2.0.1` is exactly `master` plus 47 commits
  forward, no divergent history on either side. This means the "merge" is a pure **fast-forward**,
  not a real three-way merge — nothing to resolve, no conflict possible.
- `origin/master` carries exactly one commit beyond local `master` (`58c59e8`, "Initial
  commit") that local `master` hadn't fetched yet — confirmed already contained in `v2.0.1`'s
  own history (`git merge-base --is-ancestor 58c59e8 v2.0.1` — true), so it introduces no
  discrepancy either.
- `master`'s own tree still has the *old* `FABRIC.md`/`FABRIC-2.md`/`FABRIC-3.md` naming
  (unrenamed) — expected, since today's rename commit (`b031b80`) only exists on `v2.0.1` so
  far. The fast-forward brings the rename to `master` along with everything else; nothing
  separate needs doing for it.

**Plan:**
1. Fast-forward `master` to `v2.0.1`'s tip (`git checkout master && git merge --ff-only v2.0.1`)
   — refuses loudly instead of silently doing a real merge if the ancestor relationship somehow
   isn't what the investigation above found, so this step re-verifies its own precondition.
2. Push `master` to `origin`.
3. **Verify build/function equivalence on a genuinely clean tree**, not by inference: `git clean`
   (after confirming nothing untracked-but-wanted is present), then the full acceptance sequence
   `.claude/CLAUDE.md` already mandates for any kernel change — `clean qemu` on all three
   architectures, in the foreground, one at a time, each reaching `ok>` and shutting down
   cleanly. Since the tree is byte-identical to `v2.0.1`'s post-fast-forward, this is expected
   to reproduce exactly what `v2.0.1`'s own last acceptance pass already showed — the point of
   re-running it here is to confirm that expectation holds on `master` itself, not to assume it
   from the fast-forward alone.
4. Return to `v2.0.1` as the working branch afterward (`.claude/CLAUDE.md`'s own rule: always
   return to the correct working branch after any out-of-branch work), unless told otherwise.

**DONE 2026-09-04, exactly as planned:**
1. Committed the write-up above on `v2.0.1` first (`72c14cb`), pushed. This became `v2.0.1`'s
   new tip.
2. `git checkout master && git merge --ff-only v2.0.1` — **Fast-forward**, `d2a0305..72c14cb`,
   confirming the investigated ancestor relationship held exactly as expected; no conflict, no
   merge commit.
3. `git push origin master` — `origin/master` moved `58c59e8..72c14cb`.
4. **Verified on a genuinely clean `master` tree**, not inferred from the fast-forward:
   - Hosted build (`make clean && make`): clean compile, zero warnings, same as `v2.0.1`.
   - Full 3-arch kernel acceptance (`clean qemu`, amd64/aarch64/riscv64, each in the foreground):
     all three reached `(zuse) ok>`/`ok>` and shut down cleanly, zero build errors, zero
     unexpected warnings — identical outcome to `v2.0.1`'s own last acceptance pass, confirmed
     directly rather than assumed. Logs: `logs/20260904-113208/amd64/`,
     `logs/20260904-113320/aarch64/`, `logs/20260904-113552/riscv64/`.
5. `master` and `v2.0.1` are now identical (`72c14cb` on both, `origin` and local). Returned to
   `v2.0.1` as the working branch per plan step 4.

**Task 1 closed.** `master` genuinely is the production line again, current through today's
FABRIC-series rename and the full `FABRIC-2.md` §I closure. Bare-metal-boot work (this
document's actual topic) starts from here.

## I.2 — Task 2: version correction — the `v2.0.1` bump and `v2.0.0` tag were premature

**Direct instruction, 2026-09-04**: the `LITHOS_VERSION` bump to `2.0.1` (and the branch name
that followed it) got ahead of the real state — per `Makefile.starkernel`'s own versioning
policy (`v2.0.0` = QEMU release, even major/LTS; `v2.0.1` = the SER5 hardware-track *line*,
RDRAND backend + thumbdrive image goal), claiming `2.0.1` implies hardware-track progress that
was never actually verified on real hardware — that verification is precisely `FABRIC-3.md`'s
whole open topic (§I.6 in the closed `FABRIC-2.md`). The current `master` HEAD is, correctly,
still a `v2.0.0`-class QEMU-only release. "Nothing harmful" — a version-label correction, not a
functional rollback.

**Found and fixed while correcting this, not left half-done:**
- A real gap in the FABRIC-series rename from earlier today: `Makefile.starkernel`,
  `Kconfig.kernel`, `scripts/bleach_zuse_img.sh`, four `proof/*.thy` files, and
  `src/starkernel/arch/amd64/isr.S` all still had stale `FABRIC.md`/`FABRIC-2.md`/`FABRIC-3.md`
  citations — the original sweep's file-list only matched `--include=*.md/*.c/*.h/*.4th`, which
  silently skipped every file without one of those four extensions. Found by re-grepping with
  the extensions excluded instead of included. Fixed with the same safe placeholder-substitution
  technique the original rename used (each file, one pass, ordered `FABRIC-3→2→1→0` placeholders
  then resolved) — verified no double-shifted or broken references remained afterward.
  `.claude/settings.local.json`'s own historical Bash-permission-grant log (literal past command
  strings naming the file as it was called *at the time*) was deliberately left alone — rewriting
  it would falsify an audit trail, not fix a stale citation.
- `ClaudeEXPORT/memories.json`/`conversations.json` also still reference the old names — left
  untouched on purpose, same reasoning as the memory note on that archive: it's a frozen export,
  mining material, not live documentation to keep in sync.

**Changes:**
1. `Makefile.starkernel`: `LITHOS_VERSION ?= 2.0.1` → `2.0.0`.
2. The rename-gap fix above (7 files).
3. Verified 3-arch boot (`clean qemu`, amd64/aarch64/riscv64, each in the foreground): all three
   show `LithosAnanke v2.0.0` in the boot banner (confirmed directly in each serial log, not
   assumed from the Makefile edit alone), zero build errors, zero unexpected warnings, clean
   shutdown.
4. Moved the existing `v2.0.0` git tag (previously at `2efd7fe`, the original QEMU-release
   milestone commit — that commit and its own message stay fully intact in history, only the
   tag pointer moves) to the current `master`/`v2.0.1`-branch HEAD, per explicit instruction —
   the prior tag placement was itself part of the same "got ahead of myself" correction, not a
   separate decision. No remote tag existed yet (`git ls-remote --tags origin` was empty for
   `v2.0.0`), so no destructive remote operation was needed, only a local move-and-push.
5. **Follow-up, same day**: `v2.0.1` (the working branch this and Task 1 happened on) deleted,
   local and `origin` — confirmed a strict ancestor of `master`'s new HEAD first, so nothing
   was lost. `master` is the repo's only branch from here on.

---

## II. Three architectures, three different hardware scopes

Per direct instruction, 2026-09-04. The real-hardware targets are **not** symmetric across
architectures — each gets its own section below because the actual scope of "done" is
different for each:

- **amd64 — genericity is the goal, not just the SER5.** The Beelink SER5 is the machine in
  hand and the development/reference target, but the real requirement is broader: this needs
  to boot on *any* x86_64 machine — laptop, desktop, tower, or mini PC — not just one vendor's
  quirks. SER5-only success is necessary but not sufficient; anything that works only because
  of an SER5-specific assumption (a particular ACPI table shape, a specific UEFI
  implementation's quirks) is a bug against this goal, not a deferred nice-to-have.
- **aarch64 — Raspberry Pi 5, and only the Raspberry Pi 5.** No genericity requirement across
  aarch64 boards — this is the one and only target for this architecture.
- **riscv64 — Milk-V Mars, and only the Milk-V Mars.** Same as aarch64: one specific board,
  not a generic riscv64-SBC goal.

**How to use sections III–V below.** Same discipline as everything else in this series: plan
before building, one section at a time, iterating — not all three architectures in parallel,
and not front-loading a complete plan before any real hardware is in front of us. Each section
starts with what's already true (existing repo infrastructure, already-decided policy) and
what's still genuinely unknown, not assumed.

## III. amd64 — generic x86_64 bare metal (reference hardware: Beelink SER5)

**Already true, not to be re-derived:**
- `ROADMAP.md`'s "Board-by-board hardware rollout" already names this `v2.2.0`'s gate: the
  generic GPT/FAT32 thumbdrive image (`make -f Makefile.starkernel ARCH=amd64 thumbdrive`,
  already built — `Makefile.starkernel:1018`) flashes to and boots on the real SER5 via its
  real UEFI, reaching POST + `ok>`, with the amd64 RDRAND entropy backend
  (`src/starkernel/rng/rng.c`, already built and part of `master`) serving live entropy.
- `iso-usb` (`Makefile.starkernel:1060`) is the alternate, novice-friendly path (UEFI
  isohybrid ISO for tools like GNOME Disks "Restore Disk Image...") — same underlying image,
  different flashing UX.
- `FABRIC-2.md` §I.6's own 8-step physical-boot sequence (build ISO, identify the target
  device, flash it, physically boot, decide an observation method, confirm POST, confirm
  `ok>`, document) is the closest thing to an existing plan — but it predates the genericity
  requirement and was written with no hardware in hand yet.

**Genuinely open, not yet decided:**
- What "generic enough" actually needs to be verified against, beyond the SER5 — is there a
  second, different machine available to cross-check against, or does genericity get argued
  from firmware-standards-compliance (real UEFI, no vendor-specific assumptions in the boot
  code) rather than a second physical test right away?
- Observation method for a headless/serial-less real machine (no QMP/serial socket the way
  QEMU gives us) — HDMI + keyboard? A serial console cable if the board exposes UART pins?
- Whether Secure Boot needs handling, and how, on real UEFI firmware (QEMU/OVMF's own Secure
  Boot behavior may not match every real vendor's).

## IV. aarch64 — Raspberry Pi 5

**Already true:** `ROADMAP.md` names this `v2.4.0`'s gate: boots on the real board, aarch64
peripheral-RNG backend live, Zuse mint/attach on real media. The peripheral-RNG backend itself
is **not yet built** — today's `rng_get_bytes()` (`src/starkernel/rng/rng.c`) only has a
`virtio-rng` path, real on QEMU, meaningless on real Pi 5 hardware (no virtio device there).

**Genuinely open, not yet decided:**
- Raspberry Pi 5's own boot chain — UEFI (e.g. via the community EDK2 port) or the Pi's native
  boot flow? This determines whether the existing UEFI-targeted boot code needs a different
  entry path for this board at all, or just different ACPI/DTB-provided data.
- Which peripheral RNG the Pi 5 actually exposes, and how to read it (memory-mapped peripheral
  vs. a firmware call) — not yet researched.
- Same observation-method question as amd64 (no QEMU serial socket on real hardware) —
  possibly shared tooling/approach across both boards once decided once.

## V. riscv64 — Milk-V Mars

**Already true:** `ROADMAP.md` names this (generically, "Milk-V") as part of `v2.5.0`'s gate:
boots on the real board, the Zkr (RNDR) entropy backend live. Same gap as aarch64:
`rng_get_bytes()` has no riscv64 hardware-RNG path today, only `virtio-rng`.

**Genuinely open, not yet decided:**
- Milk-V Mars's actual boot chain — this project's QEMU riscv64 target boots via UEFI
  (EDK2 `RISCV_VIRT` firmware, confirmed in `Makefile.starkernel`'s own `qemu` recipe), but
  real riscv64 SBCs commonly boot via U-Boot + OpenSBI + a devicetree instead of UEFI. Which
  one the Mars actually uses is not yet confirmed — this is the single most consequential
  unknown across all three sections, since it could mean this board needs a genuinely
  different boot entry path, not just different peripheral addresses.
- Zkr/RNDR instruction availability on the Mars's actual CPU (riscv64 Scalar Crypto extension
  support varies by implementation) — not yet confirmed.
- Same observation-method question as the other two boards.